USPTO serial 78741821
COOL CORE - THE PILLOW THAT BREATHES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COOL CORE - THE PILLOW THAT BREATHES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Commerce Township, MI
Commerce Township, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew R. Mowers
Matthew R. Mowers BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named COOL CORE - THE PILLOW THAT BREATHES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |