Drawing for WAVE HEAD TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 78742107

WAVE HEAD TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAVE HEAD TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Motorcycles and structural parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
May 21, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 15, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 15, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 25, 2006ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
May 19, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 10, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 5, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance