USPTO serial 78742284
XCALIBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XCALIBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Clair Shores, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas J. McEvoy
DOUGLAS J MCEVOY GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSON2701 TROY CTR DR STE 330; POTROY, MI 48007-7021UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 4, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 4, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |