Drawing for GAMZE MANGA ALL STARS

USPTO serial 78742867

GAMZE MANGA ALL STARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAMZE MANGA ALL STARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard R. Fine

Howard R. Fine Howard R. Fine, Attorney at Law2100 Sanders Road, Suite 200Northbrook, IL 60062UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive video game programs that are played on hand-held units that communicate with one another over a global computer networkACTIVE
028Hand-held unit for playing electronic games; hand-held unit for playing video games; hand-held unit for playing video games that may be connected directly to a like unit or communicate with like units over a global computer network for head-to-head play; hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; LCD game machinesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 22, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 22, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 29, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 29, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 27, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 25, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 26, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 26, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 26, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 3, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Nov 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance