Drawing for HYPERCUBE

USPTO serial 78742875

HYPERCUBE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYPERCUBE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN E. VANDIGRIFF

JOHN E VANDIGRIFF JOHN E VANDIGRIFF, ATTORNEY906 STONE CIR LNLEWISVILLE, TX 75056-5578UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Local and wide area computer networks; Telecommunications and data networking hardware, namely devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data, and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocolsACTIVE—
035Business consulting service in the field of operating telecommunications networksACTIVE—
038Voice over internet protocol services; Data transmission and reception services via telecommunication means; Telecommunications reseller services, namely, providing long distance telecommunication services; Telecommunications routing and junction services, namely, gateway servicesACTIVE—
042Research and development and consultation related thereto in the field of information technology for telecommunication networks, infrastructures and operations, for computer networks, infrastructures and operations, and for information networks, infrastructures and operations; Design and development of telecommunication networks and infrastructure, of computer networks and infrastructures, of information networks and infrastructures, and of multiple protocol networks, and consulting services in the filed of computer information servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 9, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance