USPTO serial 78742993
PACIFIC STAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PACIFIC STAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs, Lynne E. Graybeal, Grace Han Stanton, James L. Vana, Jason S. Howell, Elizabeth A. Kristoferson, Lisa T. Oratz, Matthew D. Schneller, Robert G. Woolston, Susan Betcher, Kathleen J. Buckley, Richard R. Ronald, Sarah J. Taylor, Julianne A. H
HEIDI L. SACHS PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE, STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for managing and configuring network hardware systems and network resources; computer software for network user authentication and controlling computer network access; communications hardware, namely, wireless bridges, inline encryptors, communication servers, IP devices, IP-based monitoring systems, firewalls, encryptors, and data storage hardware, data switches, routers, wireless access points, wireless encryption gateways; telecommunications hardware, namely, end-user customer premises equipment, namely, devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data, and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols, modems, fiber optic network adapters, portable communication server(s), laptops, wireless LAN phones, wireless communication handsets, integrated firewall and virtual private network hardware and operating software, gateway computer hardware; telecommunications hardware, namely, telephone soft switches, communication servers, devices for transporting and aggregating voice, data, and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols, modems, fiber optic cables, fiber optic multiplexers, fiber optic network adapters, fiber optic distribution instruments, digital subscription line access multiplexers; communications and telecommunications software for connecting computer network users; digital signal processors; wireless, broadband and network communication equipment, namely, portable communication server(s), laptops, mobile phones, wireless LAN phones, wireless communication handsets; satellite communication equipment, namely, computer terminals and peripherals, modems, antennas, transmitters, receivers; network security equipment, namely, integrated firewall and virtual private network hardware and operating software, gateway computer hardware; software for managing routers, switches, wireless access points, security, firewalls, encryptors, memory and storage hardware, all for communication networks; voiceover IP software; encryption software and equipment, namely, encryptors, wireless security gateways; video capturing and streaming software and equipment, namely, encoders and decoders; deployable portable network platform for deployable network infrastructures consisting of data transceivers, wireless networks and gateways, virtual private network hardware, high-speed switches and routers; virtual private network systems consisting of firewall, encryptors, gateway routers in the nature of computer communications protocol; wireless networks consisting of laptop computers, wireless voiceover IP phones, wireless access points, wireless encryption gateways, data security, and high-speed switching and routing networks, and wireless intrusion detection systems comprised of computer hardware, computer software for analyzing wireless network and data traffic, wireless sensors for detecting wireless network and data traffic; mobile voice and data wireless LAN hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |