USPTO serial 78743486
OUR SPECIALITY IS YOU.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARTZOG, WOODROW
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OUR SPECIALITY IS YOU.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Coker
MICHAEL C COKER ADAMS & COKER PC4540 KINSEY DRTYLER, TX 75703-1005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Counseling in the field of learning development; emergency medical assistance; food nutrition consultation; health care services; hospital services; medical laboratory services; medical research services; medical services; nutritional counseling; pharmacy services; physical therapy services; physician services; psychological testing; providing health care information by telephone | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |