USPTO serial 78743643
POWERED BY READY SLUMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERED BY READY SLUMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Tidwell
Mark Tidwell Jackson Walker, LLP112 E. Pecan StreetSuite 2400San Antonio, TX 78205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | System comprising computer hardware, software, and sensors in mobile delivery vehicles for monitoring, reporting, and tracking construction materials in the construction industry; a system comprising computer hardware, software, and sensors in mobile delivery vehicles for measuring and reporting the characteristics of concrete mixtures in delivery vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Cement; concrete; concrete building materials, namely, blocks, bricks, stones, columns, walls, conduit, pipes, panels, posts, slabs, fences, beams, planks; masonry building materials, namely, blocks, bricks, stones, walls, posts, pre-fabricated columns and parking curbs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Monitoring, reporting, and tracking services of construction material shipments, for the construction industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CEMEX Finance, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CEMEX Finance, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named POWERED BY READY SLUMP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |