Drawing for VIDEOLAR

USPTO serial 78743777

VIDEOLAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEOLAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear, Esq.

Jeffrey L. Van Hoosear, Esq. KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cases for audio, data and video CDs; blank audio and video discs for recording images, audio and data; computer software for image and audio editing, audio and video recording, subtitling and timing of movies, musicals and television programs; blank compact discs, CD ROMs and DVDs for video, image, audio and data recording; blank diskettes; blank phonograph records for audio recording; blank optical discs for video, image, audio and data recording; blank magnetic tapes for audio and video tape recorders; blank audio recording tapes; audio recording accessories, namely, head cleaning tapes for audio and video recorders; optical accessories, namely, filters for optical devices; blank video tapesACTIVE—
035Import and export of raw materials and components, namely, plastic components and plastic resins, such as polystyrene, polypropylene, polyethylene, polycarbonate, polyacetal, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene terepthalate for the assembly of magnetic tapes, floppy discs, optic discs, tapes, CDs and DVDs; dissemination of advertising for others via internetACTIVE—
041Rental of videotapes; video editing; publishing of electronic publication; preparing subtitles for movies, musicals and television programs; translation; rental of videotape recorders, rental of videotape players; digital imaging servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 20, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 20, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance