USPTO serial 78743965
CHROME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHROME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Chang, Director
JONATHAN CHANG, DIRECTOR VIA TECHNOLOGIES INC940 MISSION CTFREMONT, CA 94539UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, namely, computer boards, computer chips, silicon chips, semiconductors, graphic chips, graphic cards, integrated circuits, processors, computer chipsets, accelerator chips, circuit boards; computer firmware for use as a graphic device, capture cards, computer game cartridges, driver utilities for graphics, audio and video accelerators, computer peripherals, computer memory hardware, interactive multimedia computer game programs, handheld portable computers, electronic personal organizers, notebook computers, MP3 players, tablet PCs, handheld joy sticks, remote controls for playing interactive video games, Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), hard drives for computers, computer memories, video graphics controllers; multimedia accelerator boards; sound cards; video display cards; video output game machines for use with televisions; video display cards for viewing television programming on a computer; audio speakers for use with computers; computer video display cards for use with hand-held high definition television devices; handheld high definition computer monitors for viewing television programming; interactive computer kiosks used in retail, entertainment and hospitality establishments, computer interface boards, computer chips for use in increasing the performance of graphics cards, subassemblies comprising single board computers, serial and parallel interface cards, disc and tape controller cards; handheld phones, cellular telephones, digital telephones; personal navigational global positioning systems (GPS); digital display, namely, CRT monitors, DVI displays, LCD panels, HDTV displays, GPS navigational displays and automotive visual displays; portable computer terminals both allowing dial-up connectivity and personal computer access; portable interactive learning computers; computer software, namely, device driver software for use with graphics, audio and video accelerators; computer driver software for use with data compression, decompression, modulation and demodulation devices; computer software, namely, device driver software for use with computer memory devices; computer programs for controlling access to and use of stand-alone computers, namely, network access server hardware and operating programs for use with stand-alone kiosk computers which may provide internet access points; BIOS software and related operating system software for the aforesaid; computer operating system software; computer software for the editing, organizing, modifying, transmission and sharing of information; computer search engine software; computer firmware for design and development of games; computer software for development of multimedia applications; video games software; software for media content management; preproduction and postproduction data exchange software; telecommunications networking software for wireless network communications and connectivity; software for use in database management, spreadsheet and word processing; extended multimedia software recorded on magnetic media featuring stories; children's educational software featuring instruction in the field of graphics, animation, interactive communications, movies, art, sports, and music videos; computer software for wireless content delivery, preprogrammed memories containing processor instructions and printed materials and instruction manuals for the aforesaid goods sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, games and playthings, namely, multimedia play-sets, multimedia simulation games, virtual reality games; entertainment game systems, namely, entertainment game kiosks, arcade games, coin operated video game systems, action skill entertainment games, role playing entertainment systems, robotic games and toys; interactive game systems; navigational toys, laser games; handheld devices, namely, handheld game units, handheld action figures, electric action toys, handheld mechanical action toys, handheld manipulative games; game playing equipment; interactive communication devices, namely game handsets, interactive game mats and pads, interactive animatronic toys, PC gaming gear, toy gadgets, game accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by T.C. CONNECTION CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named CHROME
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |