USPTO serial 78744082
WIN WIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WIN WIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Instant noodles, instant pho (Vietnamese instant noodles), vermicelli, rice based vermicelli, instant rice porridge, instant rice gruel, chili sauce, seasoning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |