USPTO serial 78744110
AROMATIC REFLEXOLOGY ESSENTIAL THERAPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AROMATIC REFLEXOLOGY ESSENTIAL THERAPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Woodland Hills, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Instructional Educational symposium teaching integrating bodywork and therapys facilitating human wellness thru combining aromatic Reflexology signiture treatments therapies indepent of and in support of; Including natures primary elements, resources, colors, meridians reiki, yoga aroma fit, skin, beauty, body, Hand, foot, ear, facial fitness,stone therapy and all massage modalities; For the purpose of increasing value of existing professional service in Dayspa, Salon massage; As as well of wellness to public | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Massage and Dayspa, Salon exclusive application aromatic REFLEXOLOGY combining therapeutic application aromatic essential oils lotion, sea sealts,creams,scrubs, balms, scalp oils, to enhance and promote and integrate natures primary source of elements namely color, stone theripies meridians, all massage modalities, hand foot, ear, body, face, reflexology, aromatherpy for the pursuit of, holistic healing to achieving universal wellness, increasing the values of all Dayspa experiences | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |