Drawing for GOODSTORM

USPTO serial 78744116

GOODSTORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOODSTORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George C. Limbach

George C. Limbach DLA PIPER US LLP2000 University AvenueEast Palo Alto, CA 94303-2248UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for searching, retrieving and displaying information, sites, and other resources on computer networks; computer search engine software; computer game software; computer software for use in authoring, downloading, transmitting, receiving, editing, extracting, encoding, decoding, playing, storing and organizing audio data; audio and sound recordings featuring musicACTIVE—
035online retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; online retail store services featuring apparel, pre-recorded music and videos; providing online retail apparel and music stores; retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; retail store services featuring music and audiovisual works provided via the Internet and other computer and electronic communication networks; promoting the goods and services of others via a computer and communications network; advertising services; specialty merchandising services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of customized advertising materials; business development services for online stores, namely providing start-up support for retail and storefront businesses of others, issuing and tracking of invoices for others over computer and communication networks, online ordering of general merchandise and consumer goods and delivery tracking of documents, packages and general consumer merchandise for commercial purposes; business management services; order fulfillment services; providing customer service and product inquiry services for retail store owners and retail store customers via telephone and email; inventory management services for retail stores in the field of general consumer merchandiseACTIVE—
040custom manufacturing services of a wide variety of consumer products; custom silk screen printing of art work on clothing; custom manufacture of specialty merchandise for advertising use by othersACTIVE—
042e-commerce services, namely, provision of non-downloadable online software for accounts receivable, accounts payable, invoicing, inventory fulfillment, inventory tracking, customer service request tracking, and electronic payment for use in permitting users to buy and sell a wide variety of products and services via computer and communications networksACTIVE—
045online social networking servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 4, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 6, 2007PBPRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - ESU SUPERVISOR REQUEST—
Aug 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 9, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 9, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance