USPTO serial 78744132
LINEAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LINEAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell H. Stabbe
MITCHELL H STABBE DOW LOHNES PLLC1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036-6802UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Commuter aircraft engine parts, namely, the "T" shape stabilizer and vertical fin, trains, fuselage and retractable tricycle landing gear for passenger transportation in executive and corporate aviation markets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 4, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |