USPTO serial 78744202
LITTLE DISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3492654Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LITTLE DISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Fraser, Esq.
JENNIFER FRASER ESQ CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLPPO BOX 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899-2207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Ready-made packaged meals, consisting primarily of meat, seafood, poultry, game or vegetables; refrigerated and frozen ready-made meals and snacks, consisting primarily of meat, seafood, poultry, game or vegetables; prepared meals and snacks, consisting primarily of meat, seafood, poultry, game or vegetables; meat, fish, poultry and game, meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, and fruit sauces, specifically, apple sauce and cranberry sauce; eggs, milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Ready-made packaged meals, consisting primarily of cereal, pasta or rice; refrigerated and frozen ready-made meals and snacks, consisting primarily of cereal, pasta or rice; prepared meals and snacks, consisting primarily of cereal, pasta or rice; coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee, flour; preparations made from cereals, specifically, oatmeal, breakfast cereal, granola-based and cereal-based ready-to-eat food and snack bars; bread, pastries, confectionery ices, honey, treacle, yeast, baking powder, salt, mustard, vinegar, sauces, spices, ice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Healthy Kids Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Healthy Kids Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Healthy Kids Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LITTLE DISH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 17, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |