Drawing for D DREVER INTERNATIONAL MEMBER OF THE LOI GROUP

USPTO serial 78744466

D DREVER INTERNATIONAL MEMBER OF THE LOI GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with D DREVER INTERNATIONAL MEMBER OF THE LOI GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
AOpen and closed-loop control devices, including software, for plants for the heat treatment of workpieces made of metal; Plants for the heat treatment of workpieces made of metal, essentially consisting of at least one furnace for the heat-up of workpieces, in particular under protective or reactive atmospheres, and with at least one cooling or quenching facility;; industrial furnaces; parts of the goods listed, in particular for holding, transporting and supporting the workpieces; cooling, ventilation and drying facilities; Construction, installation of heat treatment plants and industrial furnaces; commissioning of heat treatment plants and industrial furnaces using services of an engineer as well as associated repair and maintenance work; Services of an industrial engineer in the filed of heat treatment, including technical design; design of heat treatment plants and industrial furnaces as well as technical consultancy in these fieldsACTIVEOct 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 13, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 5, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance