USPTO serial 78744601
VEKTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VEKTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne A. Sivertson
DAVID E. KRAUSE KRAUSE & ROLLINS, CHTD310 GROVELAND AVENUEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Filing Systems, Namely, Lateral and Vertical Filing Cabinets, Book Cases, Library Cases; Office Partition Systems, Namely, Hanging Componentry and Full Height Architectural Wall Partitions; Desking Systems, Namely, Modular Free Standing Desks and Desk Mounted Privacy Screens; Tables, Namely, Occasional Tables, End Tables, Computer Training Tables and Folding Tables; Executive Furniture, Namely, Desks, Hutches and Storage Components, Namely, Shelves and Drawers | ABANDONED | Oct 21, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |