Drawing for SA SA

USPTO serial 78744899

SA SA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OTT, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SA SA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward H. Rosenthal

EDWARD H ROSENTHAL FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ PC488 MADISON AVE FL 9NEW YORK, NY 10022-5754UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Health spa and beauty salon services; permanent make-up, namely tattooingACTIVEApr 30, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 25, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 25, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 23, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance