USPTO serial 78744902
RIDGID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RIDGID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert B. Deaver, Jr.
ALBERT B DEAVER JR LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP3400 JPMORGAN CHASE TWR600 TRAVIS STHOUSTON, TX 77002-3095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Full line of hand-operated tools and attachments therefor, namely, ball bearing knock-out sets and parts and accessories therefor; namely, ball bearing drive bolts, wrenches, punch sets and die sets respectively containing punches and dies of various sizes, and metal carrying cases for the above sold as a unit; tools for working with tubing; namely, benders for bending conduit and pipe, sizing tools for reforming deformed conduit walls; pipe taps; cutters; namely, belt cutters, pipe cutters, tube facing cutters, tubing cutters; soil pipe cutters, and cable cutters and blades and cutter wheels therefor; cable trimmers; chisels; screw, bolt, nipple and pipe extractors; hammers and sledges; hatchets, pliers; nippers, snips; manually-operated saws; saw handles; blades handles for dies and reamers, tube soldering clips for use in soldering tubes; pipe cutters, pipe reamers, pipe extractors, pipe vises, pipe die heads, pipe deburring tools, pipe and tube flaring tools, pipe threaders, bolt threaders, pipe roll groovers, pipe and tube benders, pipe and tube sizing tools, pipe and tube expanders, multi-purpose metal vises and support stands therefor, hammers, chisels, screwdrivers, screwdriver bits, pliers, nippers, shears and snips, vises, hand operated knockout sets for punching holes in pipes, cable cutters, punches, dies and die sets, flaring tools, bolt cutters, cable trimmers, shovels, spades and scoops, manually-operated drain and sewer cleaning and unclogging tools and parts therefor, namely, closet augers, hand spinners, grappler hooks and flat sewer tapes; drain snakes and drain cables; mechanically operated crimpers and parts therefor; rulers and measuring tapes; tool boxes; pipe stands; pipe threading dies and bits; tapping tools; manually operated tapping machines | ACTIVE | Jun 18, 1923 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |