USPTO serial 78745268
Serial No. 78745268
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78745268?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angelo J. Bufalino, Reg. No. 29,622
ANGELO J BUFALINO REG NO 29 622 VEDDER PRICE KAUFMAN & KAMMHOLZ222 N LASALLE ST STE 2600CHICAGO, IL 60601-1100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | hand tools, namely wrenches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |