CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PUSHTONES

USPTO serial 78745331

PUSHTONES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUSHTONES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eugene M. Pak, Esq.

Eugene M. Pak, Esq. DLA Piper US LLP153 Townsend Street, Suite 800San Francisco, CA 94107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer data files containing audio recordings for use with fixed or wireless telephones as ring tones to announce incoming phone callsACTIVE—
038telecommunications services, namely, providing ringtones and audio entertainment files, namely sound recordings for consumer use via wireless devices and the global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 16, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 9, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 13, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 13, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 15, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 23, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 9, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance