USPTO serial 78745664
REVANYWHERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REVANYWHERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL S. POLLEY
DANIEL S. POLLEY Daniel S. Polley, P.A.7251 West Palmetto Park RoadSuite 202Boca Raton, FL 33433Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Remote video communication systems comprising video cameras, mounting hardware, computers, audiovisual receivers, connecting cables and replacement parts therefore; video communicators, namely, audio and video transmitters and receivers for use in two-way communication; color video communicators, namely, audiovisual communication systems comprising a video monitor, camera, headset, batteries, carrying bag and battery charger; remote control software, namely, software for use in the remote control of the a video camera, monitor and audio equipment; computer software for use in controlling the recording and playback of audio and video data emanating from remotely located communication devices; computer software for use in managing transmission of streaming video and audio signals; computer software for use in management of online databases; wireless access point high-gain antennas; antenna cords; antennas; high power PCMCIA wireless bridge cards; laptop computers; batteries; battery chargers; and and laptop computer carrying bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Transmission of audio and video, namely, real-time audio and video forwarding over the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Creating and maintaining web sites for others for use in two way remote audio and video communication; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting from a remote location of electrical, electronic, mechanical, electro-mechanical, computer hardware and software problems; technical support services, namely troubleshooting of electrical, electronic, mechanical, electro-mechanical, computer hardware and software problems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRUNIER, JACQUES
- Other trademarks owned by BRUNIER, JACQUES
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REVANYWHERE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |