USPTO serial 78745789
GUSTO CENTRAL OREGON'S PREMIERE FOOD & WINE MAGAZINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUSTO CENTRAL OREGON'S PREMIERE FOOD & WINE MAGAZINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernard L. Kleinke, Esq.
BERNARD L KLEINKE ESQ DUCKOR SPRADLING METZGER & WYNNEA LAW CORPORATION401 W A ST STE 2400SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-7915Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazines featuring food and wine | ACTIVE | Aug 18, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |