Drawing for READING ASSURED

USPTO serial 78745989

READING ASSURED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with READING ASSURED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

Martin R. Greenstein TechMark a Law Corporation4820 Harwood Road, 2nd FloorSan Jose, CA 95124-5273UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Educational software for children; computer game programs; online downloadable game programs used for education and entertainment; computer programs and downloadable software featuring instruction in reading, writing, literature, mathematics and study habits, and instruction manuals and workbooks sold as a unit with the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
016Printed instructional, educational and teaching materials, namely, books, learning guides, workbooks, teacher guides, pamphlets, posters, charts, progress guides, worksheets, templates and test sheets, all featuring games and instruction in reading and stories for entertainment and educationACTIVE—
041Educational services and educational testing services, namely providing classes, seminars, workshops, training programs, games and student development programs in person, on-line over a network, and by a global computer network, featuring games and instruction in childhood education, child development, reading, writing and literature skills, mathematics, study habits and educational testingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance