USPTO serial 78746369
CVE CREATIVE VISION ELECTRONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3306658Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2007
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CVE CREATIVE VISION ELECTRONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Creative Vision Electronics, Inc.
Fort Lee, NJ
Creative Vision Electronics, Inc.
Fort Lee, NJ
Creative Vision Electronics, Inc.
Fort Lee, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John K. Park
YUN & PARK LLCJOHN K PARK350 5TH AVE STE 5411NEW YORK, NY 10118-5411Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Access control and alarm monitoring systems; Computer programs for the enabling of access or entrance control; Computerized time clock with fingerprint recognition; Electric locks; Electronic card readers; Electronic door closing systems; Electronic door openers; Electronic locks; Electronic timers; Electronic touch sensitive switches; Electronically operated high security lock cylinders; Facilities management software, namely, software to control building environmental, access and security systems; Programmable locking systems, consisting of electronic cylindrical locksets and keypads; Radio-frequency controlled locks; Software for the operational management of portable magnetic and electronic cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Creative Vision Electronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Creative Vision Electronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Creative Vision Electronics, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CVE CREATIVE VISION ELECTRONICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |