Drawing for BEYOND TEA

USPTO serial 78746385

BEYOND TEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEYOND TEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay H. Geller

JAY H GELLERW TWR STE 4000, 2425 W OLYMPIC BLSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail candy stores; Retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; Retail stores featuring tea, herbs, tea cups, teapots, pitchers, tea mats, decorative paper goods namely napkins and placemats, cookies, candy, decorative gift boxes, gift cards, cosmetics, hand and face lotion, skin and face moisturizers, hair shampoo and conditioner, skin and face soap, essential oils for personal use, and tee shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 9, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance