USPTO serial 78746408
ENVISIONEERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4561720Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2014
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENVISIONEERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nordborg, DK
Nordborg, DK
Nordborg, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marina F. Cunningham
MARINA F CUNNINGHAM MCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER LLPCITYPLACE II185 ASYLUM STHARTFORD, CT 06103-3402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric compressors; valves for pumps; compressors for refrigerators; valves being parts of machines, namely, high-pressure valves; electric pumps; oil pumps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Electrical heating cables; electric floor heating systems, namely, cables, electric mats and sensors for floor heating systems sold as a unit; heating installations; and oil burners for industrial and domestic use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Structural parts for land vehicles and boats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation and repair of cooling, refrigeration and heating systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Danfoss A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Danfoss A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Danfoss A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named ENVISIONEERING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2014 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 29, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2012 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |