USPTO serial 78747180
LUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 5, 2011
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle I. Mattessich
Danielle I. Mattessich Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. BOX 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-9944UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Hair salon services, namely, hair styling, coloring, washing, shampooing, conditioning, applying hair masks, head massages, and scalp massages; Beauty salon therapy services, namely, cleansing of the skin, applying face masks, applying back pack masks, skin peelers, steam treatments, toning, shaving, exfoliation treatments, treatments using creams and lotions against problem skin or older skin, and facial and body treatments consisting of a combination of creams/lotions and massage; Beauty salon services; Aromatherapy services; Skin care salon services; Massage services; Nail care and manicure services; Trichology services, namely, providing advice and consultancy relating to hair disorders in the nature of greasy hair, lank hair, dry hair, dandruff and split hairs; Counseling, advisory and information services in the field of beauty and cosmetics, and providing information about beauty by way of beauty demonstrations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 13, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 30, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 30, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 5, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 4, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 26, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |