USPTO serial 78748244
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Munich, DE
Munich, DE
Munich, DE
MUNICH, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane Donnelly
DIANE DONNELLY VON MALTITZ, DERENBERG, KUNIN, JANSSEN60 E 42ND ST RM 4410NEW YORK, NY 10165-0133UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal gaskets, namely, brush sealing gaskets, labyrinth sealing gaskets, and slide ring gaskets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | AIRCRAFT JET ENGINES; AIRCRAFT PROPELLER TURBINE JET ENGINES; AIR TURBO COMPRESSORS FOR AIRCRAFT; AIRCRAFT EXHAUST GAS TURBO-SUPERCHARGERS; MECHANICALLY DRIVEN AIRCRAFT COMPRESSORS; LIQUID AND FUEL PUMPS FOR AIRCRAFT; PUMP DRIVES FOR AIRCRAFT; RADIAL AND AXIAL AIRCRAFT COMPRESSORS; POWER-OPERATED BLOWERS; GUIDE BAFFLES FOR AIRCRAFT TURBO-ENGINES; AXIAL AND RADIAL TURBINES; FUEL INJECTION PUMPS, NOZZLES AND CONTROL VALVES FOR AIRCRAFT; COMPRESSED-AIR STARTERS; HYDRAULIC DRIVES AND RELATED COUPLERS; OIL AND FUEL FILTERS; LIQUID FILTERS; CENTRIFUGES; MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, BEARING HOUSINGS; ROTORS, NAMELY, ROTORS FOR TURBO-ENGINES; PROPELLING NOZZLES FOR AIRCRAFT ENGINES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR; BLADES FOR TURBO-ENGINES; AND STRUCTURAL PARTS OF TURBO-ENGINES MADE FROM FIBER COMPOUND MATERIALS, CERAMIC AND METALS; FUEL REGULATORS FOR USE IN GAS TURBINES, ESPECIALLY AIRCRAFT ENGINES; METAL ENGINE GASKETS FOR AIRCRAFT; SPARK IGNITERS AND IGNITION COILERS FOR USE IN GAS TURBINES, NAMELY, IN AIRCRAFT ENGINES; AND PROFILE AND DISTRIBUTING PIPES FOR USE IN GAS TURBINES, NAMELY, IN AIRCRAFT ENGINES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Fuel meters, electric and electronic controls for internal combustion and aircraft driving gears, computer software data carriers dealing with internal combustion engines and aircraft driving gears | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | HEAT EXCHANGERS, NAMELY, CROSS-COUNTERFLOW HEAT EXCHANGERS, RECUPERATIVE HEAT EXCHANGERS, REGENERATIVE HEAT EXCHANGERS; GAS BURNERS AND FLAME RETAINERS FOR USE IN GAS TURBINES, NAMELY, IN AIRCRAFT ENGINES; COMBUSTION CHAMBERS; COOLERS, NAMELY, OIL, FUEL, AND COOLANT COOLERS; AND RADIATORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Aircraft drive gears; gas turbines for aircraft, namely, shaft power driving gears; fuel supply lines for aircraft; bearings for aircraft shafts, axles, rotors and drives; gear wheels; mounting devices for driving gear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Architectural acoustic products, namely, sound absorbers for aircraft engines; non-metal gaskets, namely, brush sealing gaskets, labyrinth sealing gaskets, and slide ring gaskets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Technical maintenance and repair of aircraft driving gear and internal combustion engines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consultation in the field of aircraft driving gear technology and internal combustion engine technology, research and development in the field of aircraft driving gear, preparation and updating of computer software programs dealing with all aspects of aircraft driving gear and internal combustion engines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 1, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |