USPTO serial 78748262
FULLUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FULLUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Smith
ROBERT W SMITH MCCARTER & ENGLISH LLP100 MULBERRY STFOUR GATEWAY CTRNEWARK, NJ 07102-4056Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Document portfolios, note pads, and writing pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Belts, leather accessories, namely, wallets, pocketbooks, purses, toiletry cases sold empty, briefcases, briefcase-type portfolios, and leather key fobs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Suspenders and garters, namely ankle garters and garter belts; belts for clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |