Drawing for NO LIMITS

USPTO serial 78748319

NO LIMITS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3773569Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 6, 2010
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NO LIMITS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald S. Kadden

RONALD S KADDEN VON MALTITZ DERENBERG KUNIN JANSSEN & GISUITE 441060 EAST 42ND STREETNEW YORK, NY 10165

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Horological and other chronometric instruments, namely, wrist watchesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDNov 3, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2012C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Oct 11, 2012CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 10, 2012CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 26, 2012PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 3, 2010REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2010CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 15, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 15, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 25, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 25, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 28, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 27, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 27, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 28, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 28, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 25, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 25, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 1, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 12, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance