Drawing for TEK SYSTEMS NETCENTER ITC

USPTO serial 78748994

TEK SYSTEMS NETCENTER ITC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEK SYSTEMS NETCENTER ITC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherry H. Flax

SHERRY H FLAX SAUL EWING LLP500 E PRATT ST STE 900BALTIMORE, MD 21202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services; Temporary employment agenciesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 13, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 13, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance