USPTO serial 78750803
FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicole Page
NICOLE PAGE REAVIS PARENT LEHRER LLP41 MADISON AVE FL 41NEW YORK, NY 10010-2202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Candied fruit; Canned or bottled vegetables; Dehydrated fruit snacks; Dried fruits; Dried vegetables; Food glazing preparations comprised primarily of fruit and/or fruit pectic for use in cooking and baking; Formed textured vegetable protein for use as a meat extender or meat substitute; Frozen vegetables; Fruit and soy based snack food; Fruit and vegetable salads; Fruit chips; Fruit conserves; Fruit leathers; Fruit paste; Fruit preserves; Fruit topping; Fruit-based food beverage; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit-based spreads; Pickled vegetables; Pre-cut vegetable salad; Pre-packaged dinners consisting of vegetables; Preserved, dried, cooked and grilled vegetables; Processed soy beans; Processed vegetables and fruits; Soy bean oil ; Soy burger patties; Soy chips; Soy protein for use as a food additive; Soy-based food bars; Soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; Soy-based snack foods; Vegetable salads; Vegetable-based snack foods; Vegetable-based spreads; Vegetables, instant frozen | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Beverages made of tea; Flavourings of tea; Fruit teas; Green tea; Herb tea ; Herbal tea ; Iced tea; Japanese green tea; Lime tea; Oolong tea ; Soy bean paste; Soy burger sandwiches; Soy sauce; Soy-based ice cream substitute; Tea; Tea for infusions; Tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Cafe-restaurants; Carry-out restaurants; Fast-food restaurants and snackbars; Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant services; Restaurants; Restaurants featuring home delivery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |