USPTO serial 78751932
I-PLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3807071Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2010
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with I-PLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Dunfermline, GB
WATERLOO, LONDON, GB
WATERLOO, LONDON, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurie A. Miller
Laurie A. Miller R&E Miller Associates1181 Cadillac CourtMilpitas, CA 95035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer games software; computer games software for use on and with mobile computing devices and wireless communication devices; computer games software downloadable from a global communications network; downloadable computer games software supplied from a computer database or a global communications network; sound, video and data recordings stored on optical disks featuring games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Providing access to downloadable games and entertainment software via a wireless telecommunications network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Provision of entertainment, namely, providing non-downloadable computer games and entertainment programs to users by means of wireless communication devices, and mobile computing devices; provision of entertainment, namely, providing online computer games and entertainment programs to users by means of wireless communication devices; provision of non-downloadable computer games and entertainment programs by means of a communications network and a computer-based system; provision of information relating to entertainment; providing non-downloadable computer games and entertainment content via a global communications network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OBERON MEDIA (UK) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by OBERON MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Bridges Limited
- Other trademarks owned by OBERON MEDIA (UK) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by OBERON MEDIA (UK) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named I-PLAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |