Drawing for BIO IT

USPTO serial 78752045

BIO IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPP, HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIO IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alyson N. Dinsmore

ALYSON N DINSMORE WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Biodegradable packaging for food and beverages made from a composite of starches and grain meal, namely, hinge lid containers, boxes, trays, and carry-out cartons; biodegradable packaging for commercial and industrial use made from a composite of starches and grain meal, namely, boxes and inserts for cookie packagingACTIVE—
021Biodegradable containers for household use; biodegradable containers for household use, namely bowls, plates, cups, and portion cupsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 25, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 25, 2006PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Sep 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 21, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 21, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 25, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance