USPTO serial 78752106
DERRTY ENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4007091Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 2011
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DERRTY ENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OVERLAND, MO
OVERLAND, MO
OVERLAND, MO
Overland, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis JM Donahue III
Dennis JM Donahue III CreatiVenture Law, LLC9648 Olive Blvd, No. 226ST. LOUIS, MO 63132UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Prerecorded ] [ tapes, ] [ records, video tapes, and compact discs containing music and music videos ] (( * downloadable music files * )) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 2003 |
| 041 | Music and music video recording and production; record editing and production, and operation of audio and video recording studios for music and music videos | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 13, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DERRTY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DERRTY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DERRTY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Haynes Jr., Cornell
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DERRTY ENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 2, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | PPAC | PETITION PENDING - AMENDMENT COMMENT PERIOD | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |