USPTO serial 78752299
CARMELITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4035792Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2011
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARMELITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Morano
MICHAEL F. MORANO F. CHAU & ASSOCIATES, LLC130 WOODBURY RDWOODBURY, NY 11797-1409UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Castella Imports, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Castella Imports, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Castella Imports, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CARMELITA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2013 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |