USPTO serial 78752639
DECK FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DECK FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD A. SOKOLSKI
EDWARD A SOKOLSKI LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD A SOKOLSKI3868 W CARSON ST STE 105TORRANCE, CA 90503-6706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Waterproofing chemical compositions; Waterproofing chemical compositions for articles of fabric; Waterproofing chemical compositions for articles of leather; Waterproofing chemical compositions for articles of masonry, wood and other building and/or construction surfaces; Waterproofing membranes in liquid chemical form for use in construction | ACTIVE | Aug 9, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |