Drawing for VIDEO ON HOLD

USPTO serial 78753500

VIDEO ON HOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEO ON HOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES N. QUINN

CHARLES N QUINN FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP10TH FL2000 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3291

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Preparing and placing prerecorded video advertising messages for others; rental and leasing of recording devices and media used in playing advertising messages for use by Internet and business telephone callers; preparing custom video advertising messages interspersed with music on video recording media for playbackACTIVE—
038Providing advertising messages interspersed with music on video recording media for playback; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; advertising services in the nature of preparing and placing prerecorded video advertising messages for use via video telephones or the Internet while users, including telephone callers and customers, are waitingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 1, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 10, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 31, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 22, 2007PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Oct 15, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 2, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 25, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance