USPTO serial 78753500
VIDEO ON HOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIDEO ON HOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N. QUINN
CHARLES N QUINN FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP10TH FL2000 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3291Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Preparing and placing prerecorded video advertising messages for others; rental and leasing of recording devices and media used in playing advertising messages for use by Internet and business telephone callers; preparing custom video advertising messages interspersed with music on video recording media for playback | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing advertising messages interspersed with music on video recording media for playback; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; advertising services in the nature of preparing and placing prerecorded video advertising messages for use via video telephones or the Internet while users, including telephone callers and customers, are waiting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |