USPTO serial 78753730
BU FROM MALIBU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BU FROM MALIBU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Finkelstein
William A. Finkelstein Dreier Stein & Kahan1620 26th Street6th Floor North TowerSanta Monica, CA 90404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, jeans, pants, slacks, trousers, gauchos, capris, bottoms, shorts, Bermuda shorts, coveralls, overalls, skirts, miniskirts, dresses, jumpsuits, tops, blouses, halter tops, tank tops, cardigans, jerseys, t-shirts, shirts, knit shirts, polo shirts, sweaters, turtlenecks, vests, sweatshirts, sweatpants, boxer shorts, underwear, socks, suits, sport coats, blazers, coats, jackets, raincoats,overcoats, and headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |