USPTO serial 78753915
OPTOSCREENER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3593100Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 17, 2009
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPTOSCREENER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Québec (Québec), CA
Sainte-Foy (Quebec), CA
Sainte-Foy (Quebec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier, Jr.
George A. Pelletier, Jr. Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Image recognition devices, namely, optical correlators that provide real-time image processing through optical computer hardware and computer software programs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |