USPTO serial 78754462
BECKERMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BECKERMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cambridge, Ontario, CA
KITCHENER, ONTARIO, CA
BECKERMANN KITCHENS (2007) INC.
KITCHENER, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judith L. Grubner
Judith L. Grubner Michael Best & Friedrich LLP180 N. Stetson Avenue, Suite 2000Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | (Based on Use in Commerce), (Based on 44(d) Priority Application), (Based on 44(e) KITCHEN FURNITURE, NAMELY, CUPBOARDS, SHELVES, KITCHEN VANITIES, TABLES, STOOLS, STEP STOOLS, WORK SURFACE COUNTERS IN THE NATURE OF FURNITURE PARTS, NAMELY, KITCHEN COUNTERTOPS (Based on Intent to Use), (Based on 44(d) Priority Application), (Based on 44(e), BATHROOM FURNITURE, NAMELY, CUPBOARDS, SHELVES, BATHROOM VANITIES, TABLES, STOOLS, STEP STOOLS, WORK SURFACE COUNTERS IN THE NATURE OF FURNITURE PARTS, NAMELY, BATHROOM COUNTERTOPS; ENTERTAINMENT WALL UNITS; BOOKSHELVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | (Based on Use in Commerce), (Based on 44(d) Priority Application), (Based on 44(e), KITCHEN INSTALLATION SERVICES, NAMELY, INSTALLATION OF KITCHEN FURNITURE, NAMELY, CUPBOARDS, SHELVES, KITCHEN VANITIES, TABLES, STOOLS, STEP STOOLS, WORK SURFACE COUNTERS IN THE NATURE OF FURNITURE PARTS, NAMELY, KITCHEN COUNTERTOPS; KITCHEN REMODELING SERVICES, (Based on Intent to Use), (Based on 44(d) Priority Application), (Based on 44(e), BATHROOM INSTALLATION SERVICES, NAMELY, INSTALLATION OF BATHROOM FURNITURE, NAMELY CUPBOARDS, SHELVES, BATHROOM VANITIES, TABLES, STOOLS, STEP STOOLS, WORK SURFACE COUNTERS TN THE NATURE OF FURNITURE PARTS, NAMELY, BATHROOM COUNTERTOPS; BATHROOM REMODELING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beckermann Kitchens
- Other trademarks owned by ACORN KITCHENS
- Other trademarks owned by BECKERMANN KITCHENS (2007) INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named BECKERMANN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |