Drawing for SUNETICS

USPTO serial 78754528

SUNETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michele P. Schwartz

R. Matthew Molash, Esq. Hughes & Luce LLP1717 Main StreetSuite 2800Dallas, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Cosmetic and medical laser devices, namely, laser hair therapy devices, laser pain control devices and laser skin therapy devices for human and veterinary useACTIVE
040Manufacture of cosmetic and medical lasers and products incorporating lasers for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 17, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
May 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 25, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance