USPTO serial 78754590
URBAN ICON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with URBAN ICON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Gipson, Esq.
ROBERT E GIPSON ESQ GIPSON HOFFMAN & PANCIONE1901 AVE OF THE STARS STE 1100LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | real estate services, namely residential and commercial real estate development, property management and real estate investment | ACTIVE | Feb 13, 2004 |
| 037 | real estate services, namely residential and commercial real estate development, property management and real estate investment | ACTIVE | Feb 13, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |