USPTO serial 78754841
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernard Malina
BERNARD MALINA MALINA & ASSOCIATES PC60 E 42ND ST RM 501NEW YORK, NY 10165-0502UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath and body products, namely, bath gel, shower gel, bath wash, body lotion, hand lotion, foot lotion, body oil, aromatherapy oils, aromatherapy beads or stones, bath petals, bath beads, cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes, body talc, body powder, bath salts, bath soak, foot soak, hand soak, body spray, body splash, body scrub, milk bath, bubble bath, bath soap, hand soap, foam bath, effervescent bath crystals, effervescent bath salts, massage oils, gel eye mask, soothing eye mask, herbal eye mask, pumice stone, moisture gloves and moisture socks or booties containing lotion or gel | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Bath and body products, namely, manicure tools, namely, nail files, nail clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, nail and cuticle scissors, pedicure tools, namely, nail files, nail clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, nail and cuticle scissors | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Foam toe separators for use in pedicures | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bath and body products, namely, bath sponge, back scrubber, sea sponge, loofa sponge, complexion brush, mesh sponge, nail brush, loofa mitt | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bath and body products, namely, bath mitt | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |