Drawing for DUNKIN' DONUTS

USPTO serial 78754864

DUNKIN' DONUTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUNKIN' DONUTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephanie K. Wade

STEPHANIE K. WADE DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 EYE STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-5403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Doughnuts and bakery products; coffee; tea; cocoa; sugar; cookies; cakes; pies; muffins; plain, glazed, coated and filled fried cakes; bagels; chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; custard-based fillings for cakes and pies; chocolate-based topping; flour; flavoring extracts; confectionery chips for baking; honey; yeast; baking-powder; hot chocolate; hot cocoaACTIVE—
032Fruit drinks and fruit juices; coffee-flavored soft drinks; syrups and other preparations, concentrates and powder, for making soft drinks and fruit drinksACTIVE—
043Restaurant and carry-out food servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 15, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 24, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance