USPTO serial 78755108
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sunny S. Nassim
SUNNY S NASSIM JACOBSON, RUSSELL, SALTZ & FINGERMAN, LL10866 WILSHIRE AVE STE 1550LOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and consulting services in the areas of marketing and branding; management of professional athletes and entertainers; arranging and conducting marketing promotional events for others; advertising, including promotion of products and services for third parties through sponsorship arrangements and license agreements relating to various events; and public relations, in International Class 35 | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 19, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |