CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TOPPITS QUALITY FROZEN FOODS

USPTO serial 78755323

TOPPITS QUALITY FROZEN FOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOPPITS QUALITY FROZEN FOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie J. Lott

Leslie J. Lott Lott & Friedland, P.A.P.O. Drawer 141098CORAL GABLES, FL 33114-1098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen seafood, namely, prepared and unprepared, breaded and unbreaded, and battered and unbattered fish, fish fillets, fish steaks, whole fish, shellfish, shrimp, scallops, squid, calamari, clams, mussels, lobster, and imitation crab meat; escargot; hors d'oeuvres, namely, shrimp skewers and breaded shrimp; frozen entrees composed of combinations of seafood, vegetables and soy products; frozen vegetables, namely, peppers, zucchini, eggplant, potatoes, and combinations thereofACTIVE—
030Frozen cubes of chopped or crushed herbs and/or garlic and/or ginger for use as flavorings; hors d'oeuvres, namely, puff pastry, samosa, mini quiche, pizza fingers, spring rollsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 22, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 11, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 5, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2006MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance