Drawing for RADICAL THINKING

USPTO serial 78755418

RADICAL THINKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RADICAL THINKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward H. Rosenthal

Edward H. Rosenthal FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ, PC488 MADISON AVE FL 9NEW YORK, NY 10022-5754UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business marketing services and consulting services in the field of branding; television commercial production; providing and disseminating advertising and branded content, namely, integrating the brands of others into the content of various media programming and developing content built around brands in all media technologiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 28, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 28, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 28, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 23, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 23, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance