USPTO serial 78755757
BAKED ORANGE BLOSSOM HONEY HAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3170302Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2006
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAKED ORANGE BLOSSOM HONEY HAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mount Olive, NC
Mount Olive, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. SCOTT EVANS
J. SCOTT EVANS COATS & BENNETT PLLC201 SOUTH COLLEGE STREETSUITE 2350 CHARLOTTE PLAZACHARLOTTE, NC 27511-8118Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed meat, namely, ham | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2007 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |